The symbol of triwikramā scene in Surakarta style wayang kulit performances in the "kresna duto" story
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33153/iicacs.v9i1.287Keywords:
Wayang Performance, Kresna Duto, Triwikramā, SymbolAbstract
The Triwikramā scene in Javanese wayang kulit performances, particularly in the "Kresna Duto" episode, holds profound symbolic and philosophical significance within the Surakarta style tradition. However, despite its centrality, the variations in its presentation by different dalang (puppeteers) remain underexplored. The study aims to identify and analyze the symbolic meanings embedded in the Triwikramā scene through the distinct narrative and visual strategies employed by three renowned puppeteers: Ki Nartosabdho, Ki Manteb Sudharsono, and Ki Purbo Asmoro. This research adopts Ferdinand de Saussure’s semiotic framework to examine both the signifier and signified elements manifested in the performances. The method includes a close reading of narration (verbal text) and visual transformation of the character Kresna into Brăhălă, based on recorded performances. Findings indicate that Ki Nartosabdho emphasizes a literary and poetic narrative, creating a dramatic and emotionally immersive portrayal of Triwikramā through rich metaphors and mythological elaboration. In contrast, Ki Manteb Sudharsono presents a more visually dynamic transformation with minimal narration, relying heavily on theatrical movement and musical cues to depict the moment of transformation. Ki Purbo Asmoro offers a balanced approach, combining concise narrative with visual elements to portray the symbolic shift effectively. Across all three performances, the symbolic triadic structure of miwiti (initiation), nêngahi (intervention), and mungkasi/ngadili (termination or judgment) emerges as a consistent interpretive pattern. This study contributes to the understanding of symbolic construction in Javanese traditional performance and offers insight into the performative variations among Surakarta-style puppeteers in representing metaphysical transformation.
Downloads
References
Eco, Umberto. (2009). Teori Semiotika: Signifikasi Komunikasi, Teori Kode, Serta Teori Produksi – Tanda. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Dermawan, T. (2018). Tokoh Wayang Dalam Layar Puisi Indonesia: Pergulatan Mitos Dan Kontra Mitos. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/9986
Fiske, John, (2012). Introduction to Cummunicaton Studies. Diterjemahkan oleh Dwiningtyas, Hapsari, 2012. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Fitriana, T. R., & Verrysaputro, E. A. (2021). Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Tokoh Prabu Kresna dalam Serat Pedhalangan Lampahan Tunggul Wulung Pathet Nem untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Piwulang : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa, 9(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.15294/piwulang.v9i1.43443
Kriyantono, Rachmat (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Media, Public Relations, Advertising, Komunikasi Organisasi, Komunikasi Pemasaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Pramulia, P. (2022). Dekonstruksi Penokohan Kresna Dalam Pergelaran Wayang Kulit Lakon Semar Kuning Dan Semar Mbangun Kayangan. Buana Bastra, 9(2), 56–64. https://jurnal.unipasby.ac.id/index.php/bastra/article/view/6977/4648
Rokhmansyah, Alfian (2013). Studi dan Pengkajian Sastra. Semarang : Graha Ilmu.
Santosa, Soewarlan (2019) Kroncong joglo: kehidupan dan masyarakat penggemarnya. in: potret seni pertunjukan kita. ISI Press, Surakarta, pp. 109-133. ISBN 978-602-5573-30-9
Sudarsono. (2012). Garap Lakon Kresna Dhuta Dalam Pertunjukan Wayang Kulit Purwa Gaya Surakarta Kajian Tektual Simbolis. Harmonia, 12(1), 75–86.
Widagdo, J. (2018). Struktur Wajah, Aksesoris Serta Pakaian Wayang Kulit Purwo. Suluh, 1(1), 33–55. https://ejournal.unisnu.ac.id/JSULUH/article/view/691/1047
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Wahyo Cahyadi Cahyadi, Guntur Guntur, Suyanto Suyanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






